Friday, March 06, 2009

Enduring Blunder

President Obama has committed 17,000 additional troops to Operation Enduring Freedom, our misadventure in Afghanistan. His generals don’t know what to do with those troops when they get there; they’re not even sure what troops to send. Someone on Obama’s sprawling national security team should have told him it’s a bad, bad idea to send troops into a combat zone without a well-defined task and purpose. Ronald Reagan’s 1983 end zone fumble in Beirut should serve as a shining example of that maxim, but today’s defense hierarchy isn’t keen on learning from the past. Neocon luminary Fred Kagan, chief architect of the surge strategy, taught military history at West Point for a decade, which shows you how little regard the Army has for the subject.

The Keystone Kollege of Armed Konflict Knowledge that all our generals seem to have attended doesn’t place much importance on coherent strategy making, either.

Who’s on First?

As investigative historian Gareth Porter revealed recently, Obama was willing to go along with the full 30,000 troop escalation monty for Afghanistan until the Joint Chiefs admitted they didn’t have an end game in mind and General David McKiernan, commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, couldn’t tell him what he planned to do with the extra troops. Back in the day, all those four-stars would have kept smoke grenades handy so they’d have something to blow up the boss’s skirt if he asked a hard question. Things changed over the last eight years. McKiernan must have made the sound of one jaw dropping when he heard a commander in chief ask “why?” Talk about shock and awe.

Defense secretary Robert Gates and his rear echelon commandos have been working on an Afghanistan strategy for dog years and still haven’t hit the dartboard. One segment of the security brain trust thinks the center of gravity in Afghanistan is the Taliban. Joint Chiefs chairman Admiral Mike Mullen says the Afghan people are "the real centers of gravity." Senator John Kerry says the center of gravity in Afghanistan is in Pakistan. Let’s hope Obama stays mindful of Kerry’s track record vis-à-vis winning strategies.

Like most military matters, the center of gravity concept is broadly misunderstood, especially among the military’s top brass. Clausewitz dictated that the center of gravity must be “the point against which all our energies should be directed.” For his admonition to have any meaning, centers of gravity must be related to our objectives. Hence, the enemy center of gravity is the main obstacle between us and our goal and is the thing we must defeat, destroy, annihilate, deceive, bypass, sucker punch, pacify, erode, eradicate, and otherwise put the whammy on in order to achieve victory. Once we formulate a reasonably concrete and achievable goal, the center of gravity becomes relatively easy to identify.

Unfortunately, the “concrete and reasonable goal” factor has been AWOL since the neoconservative movement turned U.S. foreign policy into a radical equation.

We won’t make western democracies out of either of our Bananastans. We won’t eliminate corruption in them. We won’t stem opium production. If we effect regime change we’ll just be swapping out puppets. It’s too late to keep them from becoming failed states because they already are. We might make things so Afghan girls can go to school, but that’s a cockamamie reason for a bankrupt hegemon to wage war, especially given that half the kids in urban America don’t finish 12th grade.

Young Mr. Obama has said he wants to ensure that Afghanistan—and by extension Pakistan—"cannot be used as a base to launch attacks against the United States." That at least reflects a legitimate U.S. security goal, which is more than you can say for any of the gas his generals have been passing off as strategic acumen. Unfortunately, as objectives go, it’s so unrealistic as to be downright hallucinatory. If you can launch an attack on the United States from atop the Himalayas along the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan, you can launch one from any spot on the surface of the earth, or buried beneath it, or floating above it.

We can’t draft enough people to occupy that much territory.

We Don’t Know

We don’t know the enemy. The term “Taliban” describes an array of groups with different leaders. Warlords and drug lords are a whole separate power paradigm: some are aligned with one Taliban or another, some aren’t. The line between good guys and bad guys in the Bananastans is wafer thin; the official governments and their agencies are hardly more than sanctioned gang bangers. Then there’s the average Joe Bananastan who’s just fed up with the U.S. air strikes on all the weddings he goes to. And, oh yeah, none of those people had anything to do with 9/11.

Air strikes have, however, “heightened the threat” of al Qaeda “to Pakistan as the group disperses its cells [there] and fights to maintain its sanctuaries.” That’s according to the New York Times, the newspaper of record whose sources for that factoid were “senior analysts and officials of Pakistan’s main spy service” who “spoke on the condition of anonymity in keeping with the agency’s policy.”

Great. Caesar’s. Ghost. Anonymous Pakistani intelligence officials are to reliable sources what Pig Latin is to Latin. Equally unreliable and equally anonymous CIA officials recently told NPR that their airstrikes in Pakistan have “decimated” al Qaeda leadership and that they now foresee a "complete al-Qaida defeat" in the region. That’s a remarkable conclusion considering that the CIA’s best sources of intelligence on Pakistan are Pakistani intelligence officials. It doesn’t take a bloodhound to sniff two separate agendas here.

Despite knowing nothing about ourselves and even less about the enemy—Sun Tzu’s recipe for disaster a la king—Obama is going ahead with the Bananastan escalation his feckless generals and defense secretary have recommended. Obama says “the situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan demands urgent attention and swift action.” He probably feels pressured to shoot first and think later, but that’s never a good idea. I’m not a world-class military historian, but I’m a fair one, and I know of no instance in war where doing nothing proved to be an inferior course of action to doing something stupid.

The closest thing we have to legitimate security concerns in the Bananastans are that evildoers might get control of Pakistan’s nukes and the oil pipeline that runs through Afghanistan. There’s a very simple military solution to both of those problems: blow up the nukes and blow up the pipeline. Blowing stuff up is the one thing Obama’s generals know how to do real good.

In a March 6 interview with the New York Times, Mr. Obama said he is considering a plan to “reach out” to moderate elements of the Taliban. That’s a fantastic idea, and the best possible way to reach out would be to have our troops line up and shake the hand of each and every one of those mother’s sons and then climb on a plane for home.

Commander Jeff Huber, U.S. Navy (Retired) writes at Pen and Sword. Jeff's novel Bathtub Admirals (Kunati Books), a lampoon on America's rise to global dominance, is on sale now.


  1. "The Keystone Kollege of Armed Konflict Knowledge that all our generals seem to have attended doesn’t place much importance in coherent strategy making, either."

    Jeff, Jeff, Jeff, My dear sweet moral man.

    That's because the Kollege's only major appears to be "Arms Marketing 101."

    Crap. I'm getting cynical in me old age, eh?

    Hmmm, maybe the other major is "Prosthetic Limb Marketing 101?"

    Do you think Obama knew what kind of lobbyist hell he would be forced to deal with?

    I mean, really, there IS a difference between optimism and ignorance. You'd think he knew the difference coming form ChiTown and all.

  2. Just doing what I can to shame them, Nunya.

  3. Anonymous9:24 PM

    Generals and Admirals like war, they can get promotions and medals.
    Obama does as he is told and says what is written for him. Why believe that he would be different from the last prez? Cabinet secretaies get to see their investments in the weapons industries grow and prosper. Cmdr., from your background, I think you might concur that this a game which has no end except that of the other failed empires. Not exactly the retirement I had planned for..

  4. Not unless something big changes.

  5. Anonymous12:59 PM

    "Neocon luminary Fred Kagan" ----For the life of me I can't figure out how or why that bean bag dumb nuts has even the remotest scintilla of influence. Does he play with toy soldiers and pretend he's General Clausewitch?

  6. I suspect that's exactly what he does, MandT.


  7. Anonymous6:02 PM

    What do you think of this guy's analysis (from 2003)?

    video lecture
    War and Globalization - The Truth Behind September 11 (9/11)

  8. K,

    I think this guy has an unfortunate talent for making the plausible sound incredible. ;-)


  9. Anonymous10:44 PM

    Yes I know that's his speaking style but what I was asking is about the content of his analysis. Is it a good analysis and is the military aspect of it accurate?

  10. Anonymous10:45 PM

    By the way he is French Canadian so it might be a cultural thing.

  11. Wars are always fought over the sorts of things he talks about. He strays into incredible territory with 9/11 conspiracy theory specifics.

  12. Anonymous11:59 PM

    Surprised you haven't had more to say about Chas Freeman. He sounds like your kind of guy. A clear thinker, and not shy. And his assassination, so to speak, something of consequence. How free does Blair feel now to tell us what needs to be told? About Iran, or, as he has already said, that the global economic crisis is a greater threat to American security than global terrorism. I mean, isn't that kind of thinking anathema to the folks you are fighting? And isn't the attack on Freeman in fact an attack on Blair?

    The fingerprints are clear - Schumer, Pelosi, Israel (the congressman) and the rest of the gang. And all the many forces behind them. And Obama, off somewhere having vapors. It's kind of a distillation of our national tragedy.

    Regarding Afghanistan, and the likely results of a 'surge', see this:

    Geronimo, with firepower. We lose.

    The Guardian has done some superb videos, available at Real News Network. Short, and to the point. Search 'Guardian' then 'Afghanistan', to find them all.

  13. Big Zion, the warmongery's center of gravity.

  14. Anonymous12:58 PM

    "Big Zion, the warmongery's center of gravity." Israel with all of its thousands of years of story and experience, is blind to its own shoah, growing bitter weeds in the heart David, insuring its own, eventual destruction.

  15. I'm afraid you're right. The fools.

  16. Why does our military think repeating 2,000+ years worth of mistakes will yield, this time, a different result?

    Get them out, get them all out now. You don't win in Afghanistan, you just die.

  17. Anonymous5:19 AM

    Present-day society, the rapid development of science and technology makes cell phones wholesale is no longer a simple phone communications equipment only. Wholesale cell phones have many features, entertainment, scalability, and so have a good expression of the discount cell phones will be to maximize the effectiveness of multimedia technology.
    Cell phones from simple communication became a full-featured entertainment terminal . Can be said that cell phone china new milestone in the industry. This fully demonstrates that, cheap cell phones entertainment has become the most sought after consumer applications and has become the focus of the mobile phones market.

  18. Anonymous8:04 AM

    Really trustworthy blog. Please keep updating with great posts like this one. I have booked marked your site and am about to email it

    to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading..
    sesli sohbet
    sesli chat