Tuesday, May 11, 2010

The Gray Lady and Officials Anonymous



The New York Times, the “Gray Lady” that abetted the efforts of Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld to dupe America into supporting the Iraq invasion, is still the willing echo chambermaid of the warmongery. The most egregious piece of covert propaganda the NYT ran during the run-up to Gulf War II was the Sept. 8, 2002, article by its access-poisoned reporters Michael R. Gordon and Judith Miller that heralded “HUSSEIN INTENSIFIES QUEST FOR A-BOMB PARTS.”
We now know that the article was part of the elaborate Nigergate hoax, and that Gordon and Miller were establishing a practice that would become the NYT’s standard disinformation tactic for years and perhaps decades to come. In presenting the case that Hussein was pursuing nuclear weapons capability from Niger, Gordon and Miller cited unnamed administration officials, American officials, senior officials, intelligence officials, government officials, United Nations officials and plain old generic “officials” a walloping 28 times.
In May 2004, the NYT’s editorial board gave a smirking apology that allowed as how it “found a number of instances of coverage that was not as rigorous as it should have been” in its pre-invasion reporting. Nonetheless, the editors maintained that in most cases “what we reported was an accurate reflection of the state of our knowledge at the time, much of it painstakingly extracted” from sources that were “themselves dependent on sketchy information.” And these sources passing along sketchy information were who? “Administration officials” who “now acknowledge that they sometimes fell for misinformation.” Poppycock. Those officials fell for the misinformation they wanted to hear, and they had no qualms about passing it along to the unsuspecting public.
If the NYT had been sincerely contrite about leading us down a primrose path to quagmire, it would have stopped allowing faceless officials to make baseless assertions about the threats posed by presumed “enemies.” NYT’s editors weren’t a smidgen rueful, or course, and only an industrial-strength case of Orwellian doublethink could have led them to believe their sources were unaware that the information they were passing along was as genuine as a round dollar bill.
Don’t think for a moment that the 2008 election brought about a change in the NYT’s pro-war position; it will exploit any flimsy excuse to help keep the public scared witless. Stanley McChrystal canonizer Dexter Filkins is but one of the many NYTreporters whose noses are permanently embedded up the COINdinistas‘ tent flap.
I wasn’t a bit surprised to see the story frequent Filkins collaborators Mark Mazzetti and Scott Shane filed on May 5 that evoked phantom-sourced tales of the evildoers’ latest act of evil derring-do. “Evidence Mounts for Taliban Role in Bomb Plot” the headline blared. Hmm.
Who do you suppose is trying to beat up support to stay the course in the Bananastans*, and maybe re-re-re-escalate the reindeer games there? Why, “American officials,” of course. They tell the NYT it is “very likely” that the Pakistani Taliban, “once thought unable to attack the United States” helped “inspire and train” Faisal Shahzad, the naturalized U.S. citizen (immigrant!) under arrest for allegedly attempting to bomb Times Square on May 1.
The NYT says information about the Shahzad-Taliban connection comes from interrogations of Shahzad, which in turn comes from the aforementioned unnamed officials, who say unnamed “investigators” have “accumulated other evidence that they would not disclose,” and in fact, somewhere down around paragraph six, Filkins and Mazzetti admit that the officials, who only spoke with Filkins and Mazzetti on the condition they could stay anonymous (of course), “gave few details about what Mr. Shahzad had told investigators.” Just enough, apparently, for the NYT to run a front-page story with a headline that says the Taliban were behind the Times Square bombing.
The Filkins-Mazzetti story contains a pile of other trash about how the Times Square attempt ties in with other terror attempts and other terror groups, and how it’s President Obama’s drone attacks that are getting all these terrorizers riled up at us, and how some officials think Obama has “not taken the Pakistani Taliban threat seriously,” an eye-watering claim considering that we’re fighting the Taliban in a stupid, seemingly endless war half a world away.
I can’t speak with any authority about what motivated the Mazzetti-Shane article, but the piece has the earmarks of being part of an effort by team McChrystal – most notably by his information warfare officer, Rear Adm. Greg Smith – to ward off the oncoming bus that the Obama administration and a senior element within the five-sided hunker bunker are preparing to throw Banana Stan under subsequent to his failure-in-a-box Marjah offensive.
And all this hoopla is over another terrorkind who was an even bigger screw-up than the panty bomber. Shahzad built a bomb that couldn’t have caused a large explosion even if it had gone off. He locked the keys in both the car bomb car and the getaway car so he had to take a subway car home and beg his landlord to let him into his apartment. He got caught because the number in the memory of a cell phone he left in the car bomb car matched one he’d given customs authorities earlier. When officials arrested him on an aircraft about to take off for Dubai, Shahzad said, “I was expecting you.” He should have said, “What took you bozos so long?”
On May 8, the NYT’s Jane Perlez reported that anonymous officials say the locked-car bombing attempt came “amid increasing debate within the administration about how to expand the American military’s influence – and even a boots-on-the-ground presence – on Pakistani soil.” One of the officials says we’re telling Pakistan, “Sorry, if there is a successful attack, we will have to act,” by further escalating our presence in that country.
Lost in the NYT-generated hoopla is reporting by the Associated Press from May 5 – the same day the Mazzetti-Shane fright piece hit the streets – that authorities don’t believe there are any other suspects in the plot and that several arrests in Pakistan in the past two days were not related. The Pakistani Talibani have denied any connection with Shahzad, and even McChrystal’s mentor “King David” Petraeus admits that Shahzad was a “lone wolf.”
The New York Times continues to set unprecedented sub-standards in printing third-hand innuendo and framing it as cold fact. Imagine what this country would be like if the NYT took its “newspaper of record” buzz-label seriously and not as license to get away with journalistic murder, literal murder of both our troops and of civilians in the countries they occupy.
* The Bananastans are Pakistan and Afghanistan, our Central Asian banana republics.
Originally posted @ Antiwar.com.

21 comments:

  1. "All people produce minor lies every now and then, therefore these lies can easlily be detected, so if you are going to lye, do it in such a huge scale that noone can imagine that anyone dares to lie that much", said Goebbels, and unfortunately he was right.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  3. agincajun12:30 PM

    Good to see you call them out and slap them around, but anyone with a minimal amount of critical thinking should have figured out just how full of manure the NYTs has become.....long ago.

    This is off topic but I must ask..........what is happening concerning Furlong, Clarridge and the possible connections with Blackwater? Has Gates buried the investigation? Will Obama send Rahm across the river to help cover up the tracks with bovine excrement? The drums are mighty quiet.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well, on the bright side, the NYT's stock price is a fifth of what it was when Gordon and Miller bent over for Rumsfeld et al. Somebody's paying attention. At this rate, they should be out of business by the time of our next big war with Evil. One can hope, anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I read the NY Times for Paul Krugman and Bob Herbert. Once you play politics with "news"... and lose the trust of your readers... almost impossible to get it back. Although... people still (apparently) read Caribou Barbie's ghost writer.

    Any problem with people re-posting your commentary on faceBook? Or, like the AP, do you have "restrictions" on the stuff you write???

    (Don't want to violate any copyright laws. Too old to go to jail.)
    However, I would like to share your columns with some friends.

    ReplyDelete
  7. El, please feel free to share what's on here. I've added a Facebook share gizmo at the top of the page. All you have to do is click.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Some more shards-of-glass-in-the-eyes moments from Stanley the Manly on PBS.

    I swear I don't know what he's talking about.

    PBS News Hour Exclusive: McChrystal Says Despite Progress in Afghanistan, 'Nobody is Winning'

    You're point being...?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thanks.... and Done.

    From now on... I'll use your gizmo.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I saw that too, Fil. Thanks for the link. Unbelievable, huh?

    ReplyDelete
  12. hello i linked you in my site, if you don't mind can you link me too here please!...

    Link me
    http://online-preview.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  13. As I wrote above... Bob Herbert is one of two reasons I read the NY Times. His commentary this morning is worth a read.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/15/opinion/15herbert.html?hp

    Especially relevant, is the last paragraph.

    ReplyDelete
  14. El, the last paragraph of the NYT article is just like the end of Kipling's poem:

    If any question why we died,
    tell them, because our fathers lied


    I just found out a couple of days ago that my cousin is in Afghanistan. I thought I was going to be sick.

    ReplyDelete
  15. i just reminding myself while reading this concept.


    http://tv-infoz.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  16. The Taliban are back in Marjah - if they ever left, that is.

    From the NYT:

    Taliban Hold Sway in Area Taken by U.S., Farmers Say

    Well, that went well...

    ReplyDelete
  17. This is part of the human cost of these two wars.

    http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0515/troops-hospitalized-mental-health-reason/

    Up in your part of the country, Commander, there is an organization doing some pretty good work, is this area. It's called Pets2Vets. They match vets, a lot of them recovering from mental problems, with shelter pets from the D.C. area shelters. They seem to accomplish a lot more than the V.A.in helping in the recovery of vets with PTSD, and other mental health related problems. As you well know -- animals, dogs and cats, pretty much offer unconditional, non-judgmental love and loyalty.

    Course nothing is going to ever be enough.

    That's the sad part.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Really trustworthy blog. Please keep updating with great posts like this one. I have booked marked your site and am about to email it

    to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading..
    seslisohbet
    seslichat
    sesli sohbet
    sesli chat
    sesli

    ReplyDelete
  19. Really trustworthy blog. Please keep updating with great posts like this one. I have booked marked your site and am about to email it

    to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading..
    seslisohbet
    seslichat
    sesli sohbet
    sesli chat
    sesli

    ReplyDelete
  20. Really trustworthy blog. Please keep updating with great posts like this one. I have booked marked your site and am about to email it

    to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading..
    seslisohbet
    seslichat
    sesli sohbet
    sesli chat
    sesli

    ReplyDelete
  21. NewStreetFashion
    Ed Hardy
    stylish design
    Ed Hardy Wholesale
    fashion excellent quality
    wholesale Ed Hardy
    ED Hardy clothing bring you a super surprise!
    ed hardy wholesale clothing
    The quality is so good
    christian audigier
    Young and creative style
    abercrombie and fitch
    You can have a look at it.
    abercrombie & fitch
    jordan 8
    jordan 9
    jordan 10

    ReplyDelete