Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Marja Madness

As journalist Gareth Porter said in a recent interview with Real News, Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s offensive in Marjah, Afghanistan, is "more of an effort to shape public opinion in the United States than to shape the politics of the future of Afghanistan." Like so much of what we’ve seen in our woeful war on terrorism, the Marjah effort is short on substance and long on Newspeak, Doublethink, and other Orwellian deceptions.

The Washington Post, the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, and an unhealthy chunk of the rest of the news outlets are calling the Marjah madness a "test" of "Obama’s strategy" in Afghanistan. Amazingly, nobody is calling it a test of McChrystal’s strategy. Stan the Man is, after all, the maestro who orchestrated the big honking counterinsurgency (COIN) plan with its attendant troop escalation and who then, along with Gen. David Petraeus and the rest of the warmongery, boxed Obama into going along with the scheme through an expansive media campaign that included McChrystal’s September 2009 infomercial on 60 Minutes.

We don’t need to feel sorry for Obama, though. He asked for this during the 2008 presidential race when he decided to show the hawks his baby-makers by saying he’d pull us out of Iraq but he’d "get the job" done in Afghanistan. Pavlov’s dogs of war started frothing when he stepped on that land mine. Obama had a chance to get rid of the war dons – Petraeus, McChrystal, Joint Chiefs chairman Adm. Mike Mullen, and the Pentagon’s bureaucratic survival savant, Robert Gates – when he took office. But no, President Obama kept them around, despite the fact that they all had publicly criticized Candidate Obama’s plan to establish an Iraq withdrawal timeline. Obama exacerbated things when he named retired Marine Gen. James Jones as national security adviser; Jones had stated for the record in 2007 that an Iraq withdrawal deadline would be "against our national interest."

So, yes, Marjah is a referendum on Obama’s fitness as commander in chief, and it’s becoming clear that the guy is in over his pay grade.

A key component of McChrystal’s hallucinatory COIN plan is an initiative to build up Afghanistan’s security forces to an end-strength of 400,000. He’d be better off paying them all off to go home and keep out of the way.

When 60 Minutes reported on the status of Afghan security forces training in late January, the native troops were literally shooting themselves in the foot and their instructors in the leg. According to 60 Minutes – which means according to what Af-Pak propaganda czar Rear Adm. Gregory Smith told 60 minutes – the Afghan troops were commandos, Afghanistan’s best soldiers, and they were being trained by Green Berets, America’s "best soldiers."

The "specialized" Afghan troops had received three months of "advanced training" before coming under the tutelage of the Green Berets. When they displayed their tendency to shoot everybody but the bad guys, the Green Berets drilled them in the fundamentals of how to load their weapons and hold them safely. When the Afghan commandos couldn’t even perform those tasks correctly, the Green Berets started treating them like raw recruits and tried to instruct them by yelling at them.

Yet somehow Smith and his spin merchants and their dupes in the mainstream media expected us to believe that by late February, Afghan forces were ready to take charge of their country’s destiny. "In Marjah offensive, Afghan forces take the lead," claimed a Feb. 15 headline in the Christian Science Monitor. But by Feb. 20 even the New York Times, the journalistic home of McChrystal idolater Dexter Filkins, had to confess that "Marines Do Heavy Lifting as Afghan Army Lags in Battle."

Bravo to journalist C.J. Chivers, a former Marine, for reporting that the assertion by American and Afghan officials that portrays "the Afghan Army as the force out front in this important offensive against the Taliban" conflicts with "what is visible in the field." By all important measures, "from transporting troops, directing them in battle and coordinating fire support to arranging modern communications, logistics, aviation, and medical support – the mission in Marjah has been a Marine operation conducted in the presence of fledgling Afghan Army units, whose officers and soldiers follow behind the Americans and do what they are told."

I hope the owners of the Times don’t fire Chivers. It would be nice to think that the rag of record has at least one reporter capable of telling the truth.

Another Times contributor, Timothy Hsia, a West Point graduate who has served in Iraq, says in a Feb. 18 piece that success in Marjah will hinge on a "civilian surge." Hsia has, lamentably, bitten off on the jagged piece of crack-pottery that says in order to succeed in Afghanistan we need lots and lots of American civilians to go over there and be policemen and fire dudes and construction workers and so on as part of a Civilian Response Corps. The idea is so ludicrous that its proponents picked Dick Cheney protégé Doug Feith, the dumbest freaking guy on the planet, to shill it in a May 2009 Wall Street Journal op-ed.

We already have a Civilian Response Corps; it’s called the Peace Corps, and it’s been around since before people joined it to get out of fighting in Vietnam. As you might have already inferred, the reason we call it a "Peace" Corps is that it only works in a peacetime scenario. Sending U.S. civilians into a hot war zone, especially one like we have in Afghanistan where there are no front lines, doesn’t accomplish a whole lot except get a whole lot of U.S. civilians killed. The only way to try to protect the civilians is to send more soldiers to the war zone or (aha!) hire mercenary outfits like Blackwater to do the job. Even then, the civilians have to stay holed up in areas where the soldiers or the hired thugs can protect them, so they can’t do what we supposedly sent them for.

But civilians provide a vital layer in the Pentagon’s lame-excuse stratagem. If our military can’t win a war, it’s because we don’t have enough military in the theater of operations. If we have enough military, we don’t have enough military from the country we’re fighting in to fight with us. If we have enough military from the country we’re fighting in but they turn out to be a pack of Gomer Pyles, then we don’t have enough civilians involved. Next, I suppose, come household pets.

Of course, civilians might be able to do one thing that our Green Berets can’t: teach Afghan soldiers how to load and carry their rifles.

Originally posted @ Antiwar.com

Commander Jeff Huber, U.S. Navy (Retired) writes at Pen and Sword. Jeff's novel Bathtub Admirals (Kunati Books), a lampoon on America's rise to global dominance, is on sale now.

12 comments:

  1. Mr. Huber,

    I'm a radio show producer. We would love to have you on. How do I get in touch with you?

    ReplyDelete
  2. If Marjah is just a dress rehearsal - and a pretty bad one at that - what's going to happen when they take the COIN to Kandahar, a city of about one million? I don't even want to think about it.

    The inimitable Fred Reed's comments on a Stanley McChrystal interview. He figures that if the guy ever gets sick, he will require an equine proctologist.

    Omeeomy. How I wish I'd written that.

    He also has a proposal for the irrepressible war fighters:

    "...Now, if America wants to kill its own soldiers, that is America’s business. It is a matter of national sovereignty with which no other country should have the right to interfere. McChrystal could maybe hold a private war somewhere in the southwestern deserts. You know, McCrystal vs. David Petraeus, with two divisions each, twelve rounds or knockout, no holds barred, but they have to buy their own weapons.

    But leave others out of it."


    Amen to that.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Not only did he keep Gates once, he kept him twice. Obama serves the same foreign policy master that W did. The O Team is just a little more slick about it.
    Endless wars without borders must stop now.
    Every one serves a higher authority. The American people should now understand that the O Team is bought and paid for by these Corps. and Masters of War. They are the higher authority that our foreign policy pays homage to. Israel and their war machine is pounding the drums of war hard against Iran. We must tell them in no uncertain terms, that if they attack Iran there will be hell to pay.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous7:12 PM

    Marjah is a referendum on every one over the rank of O-4.

    They are all proving pawns of their militarist war profiteer masters.

    Of no value to the republic which was over run about 60 years ago.

    ilsm

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dress rehearsal indeed, Fil. I'll have some things to say on that subject next week.

    RZ,

    Yeah, Obama extended the weasel's tenure, didn't he? Another reason not to let the Prez off the hook.

    ilism,

    Yeah, I've been saying can everybody )-6 and above, but by now, the Petraeus worldview has filtered down to the major level.

    INN,

    I'd love to appear on one of your shows. Please email me at brett20@aol.com.

    J

    ReplyDelete
  6. This might have been the original hook. The line and the sinker came later. Here we have Zbig, NEOLIB and Zalmay Khalilzad NEOCON. In the same room giving a seminar at Columbia where Obama was present. Could this have been the beginning of the "grooming process"? I believe it was.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "So, yes, Marjah is a referendum on Obama’s fitness as commander in chief, and it’s becoming clear that the guy is in over his pay grade."


    Ummmm...?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Uh, let me explain myself. I sure did get sucked into the Hopey Changey thing, after my diplomatic choice (Hilary) was beaten out.Way back in '04 my smiling reaction to His speach athe Dem conventions was "He sure does give good speech!" I knew he was being vetted then.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous7:34 AM

    In the acquisition business if the O-2 was not a grand admirerer and cheerleader for the naked emperor's tailor that O-2 would be gone long before the O-4 board.

    Seems it is filtered into the Line branches.

    ilsm

    ReplyDelete
  10. just a correction...Gen. Jones is retired Marine...not Army...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thanks for the catch, MM.

    ReplyDelete
  12. LOL, I apologize. I just read my own comment from above. I forgot to add the link. LOL With out the link the comment does not make much sense. Although to some none of my comments make much sense. Her it is.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/30/us/politics/30obama.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1

    ReplyDelete