Monday, May 21, 2007

Iraq: Fred Kagan and the "Krazies"

In a May 6 New York Times article, noted neoconservative and chief architect of the Iraq escalation strategy Fred Kagan said that lack of a "Plan B" is no reason to criticize the surge. He argues that, in fact, "there is no Plan B because there cannot be one." There can be no Plan B, he further states, because "The strategy now underway in Iraq… will change the situation in Iraq significantly, whether or not it succeeds in its aims."

Whether the surge succeeds, fails or fall somewhere in between, there's no need to plan ahead to the next step because it's too soon to tell what that next step might need to be. We can't predict now what things will look like in the fall, when U.S. commander in Iraq General David Petraeus is scheduled to report on the surge progress to Congress. So there's no sense revisiting alternate plans proposed in late 2006--they'll be irrelevant in 2007. Kagan tells us we especially don't want to revert to that darn old Iraq Study Group (ISG) proposal. It won't make any sense at all come this fall, according to Kagan.

But then, when it comes to not making sense, Fred Kagan is in a league of his own.

In January 2007, when he published Producing Victory: A Plan for Success in Iraq, Kagan stated that "Other courses of action have been proposed. All will fail." He especially condemned the idea of increasing imbedded trainers for Iraqi forces and engaging in diplomatic talks with Iraq's neighbors, and pretty much everything else the Iraq Study Group (ISG) proposed.

On Sunday, Kagan hit the political chat show circuit to bolster support for his escalation strategy, which was interesting timing.

We Got Your Plan B Right Here, Mister

On Monday, Washington Post writer Michael Abramowitz reported that the recommendations of the ISG, once all but summarily dismissed by the administration, are being looked at again by both the White House and congressional Republicans. Lawmakers from both parties plan to introduce legislation soon that will make the ISG's 79 recommendations official U.S. policy. Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas) says the ISG's recommendations are "gaining more support in the Congress because the situation in Iraq is not going as well as we had hoped."

Senator Lamar Alexander (R-Tennessee), one of the bill's sponsors, says, "My sense among Republican Senators is we know very well that the current course is not a sustainable course over a longer period of time. If we drift into September, [the president] may not be able to find a bipartisan basis to support a long-term limited interest in Iraq."

Lee Hamilton, co-chairman of the ISG, says that Washington officials "don't know what to do… They don't have a framework. They are looking. They are searching. Something has to follow the surge [of U.S. troops to Iraq]--they are interested in our proposals as a framework for policy."

Put another way, "they" desperately need a Plan B to pull out of their sleeves when Petraeus comes to them in September with nothing in his hand but his hat.

But the truth be told, they need more than a Plan B. It may well be that come September, the ISG's recommended diplomatic, economic and rebuilding measures will be overcome by events on the ground, especially if the surge increases the scope of violence throughout Iraq, and U.S. troops find themselves in the middle of a Hobbesian cross-fire for which even deluded ideologues like Fred Kagan can't suggest a "victorious" solution. Plan C will look very much like the "redeployment option" that Representative Jack Murtha (D-Pennsylvania) proposed in the fall of 2005. (Come fall of 2008, the administration won't credit Murtha for this idea. They'll call it a "containment strategy," and hope nobody remembers that's what we called the strategy we conducted for the decade between Desert Storm and Iraqi Freedom.)

Unfortunately, Plan C may not be enough to cover the likely contingencies. If we let Kagan and the rest of the neoconservative cabal push us down Plan A far enough and long enough, we'll need a Plan D like the one that William Lind described at Military.com in March 2007.
America now has an army…of more than 140,000, deep in Persia (which effectively includes Shiite Iraq, despite the ethnic difference). We are propping up a shaky local regime in a civil war. Our local allies are of dubious loyalty, and the surrounding population is not friendly. Our lines of communication, supply and retreat all run south, to Kuwait, through Shiite militia country. They then extend on through the Persian Gulf, which is called that for a reason. If those lines are cut, many of our troops have only one way out…up through Kurdish country and [Turkey] to the coast.

Lind outlines two plausible catastrophe scenarios, either or both of which could dictate such a dire retreat strategy. In the first, Shia militias would target and disrupt our vulnerable supply lines between Baghdad and Kuwait. In the second, Iran, probably in response to a U.S. attack, would shut down the Persian Gulf. As Lind says, "Both of these threats are sufficiently real," and the old military virtue of prudence suggests that plans should be made to react to such contingencies.

Neocon Carne

There's not an ounce of meat in Fred Kagan's strategies or in his arguments. I spent enough time as a tactical and operational planner during my military career to know that anybody who says, "All other plans but mine will fail" and "we must stick with my plan whether it works or not, and not make plans for what to do if it doesn't work" should be shown to the front gate. That Kagan spent 10 years as a professor of military history at West Point makes me shudder at the damage he may have done to the long-term intellectual integrity of the Army officer corps. That some our most senior policy makers still listen to him is a leading symptom of the critical level our national insanity has reached.

That GOP legislators appear to be standing up to Mr. Bush and his neocon inner circle may be a harbinger of more rational policies and strategies ahead. But it's no guarantee that Congress can put what one active duty four-star military officer allegedly referred to as "the crazies" back in their box.

14 comments:

  1. I'm glad you are taking on Kagan. His arguement about how Iraq is so important flies in the face of the facts. By invading Iraq, we actually empowered Iran. Sure if we left, it would be bad for the Iraqis, but 50% of that is because they won't get their own act together.

    So yea there will probably be more misery for Iraqis. But that's the dirty little secret that we should be saying. It will be more misery for Iraqis-not for Americans.

    Americans should be in favor of those things that favor Americans. And who knows? The Iraqis might get it over with and at least be stable-if not pro western. Either way Iran comes out of this a lot stronger because she does not have a huge enemy on any of her borders now.

    Be careful what we wish for, we may surely get it...............

    ReplyDelete
  2. Did you submit your site at blogsearch.sg?

    You can reach blogsearch by just typing blogsearch.sg in your browser window or click here

    This is a service by bizleadsnet directory of web logs.

    BALLISTICS

    ReplyDelete
  3. Skippy,

    I've been lobbing shells at Kagan for some time. Hope to get this published at miitary.com.

    ReplyDelete
  4. William Bollinger2:10 PM

    You won't if you keep mis-spelling their name. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Iraq is the central front in the war against Al Qaeda." Kagan seems to have this fixation on the "central front" theme, must be his background in Soviet History. Great we have someone with a PHD in Soviet Military History advising our President on middle east affairs (especially war fighting). Hey Fred there hasn't been a central front in a war since 1945.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Barndog5:33 AM

    Obviously, none of these worthless asses have never had a round fired at them - nor would they volunteer to do so.

    Surely, a few hundred more dead - won't hurt them any. Just like it doesn't hurt Bush. One must have an active conscience to feel any remorse - which Bush doesn't.

    Semper Fi

    ReplyDelete
  7. semper fubar7:57 AM

    I think this week's capitulation by the democrats makes it clear that, no matter how insane and outlandish Kagan's strategy is, we aren't leaving Iraq. Ever. At least, not in our lifetime.

    Unless Iraq truly becomes our Afghanistan. I wonder how many more billions we can afford?

    ReplyDelete
  8. William Bollinger11:54 AM

    semper fubar,
    Personally, I think we should just quit fighting this shift. Let the right-wing nutcases have the Republicans, and they can compete or merge with the Constitution Party. Moderate Republicans and the DLC can have the "conservative" Democratic Party, and liberals and progressives should just move to the Greens or form a new party. It's not the name that's important, just what you believe in.

    ReplyDelete
  9. BTW, Jeff, thanks for that link. (I'd forgotten where I'd originally found it.)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Lacoste polo shirts to the people's feeling is natural and pro-and the Burbrery polos comfortable, affordable good wear burberry polo shirt both in Europe and the United States or Asia, almost Everyone must become a wardrobe in the style of clothing! There are so many beautiful coat, but also with the needs of others can be more perfect. Levi jeanshave a straight trouser leg, it looks clean and able; Diesel Jeans and Levis Jeansis pet fashion, elegance and fashion, with a polo shirt and holding babolat aeropro driveor cheap tennis racquets, what you can think of.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Ed hardy shirts to tattoos tattoo art and graffiti into the street among the ed hardy clothes. Puma basketby the majority of consumers, Puma basket of products that were sold out on a listing. Cheap puma shoes and match various types of clothing, belts, cheap jacket, Wholesale Handbags, watches, pens and other products are also beautifully designed, excellent technology, elegant shape. People buy nike max shoes, they are also no longer pick Association other goods.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Also popular as a way to fashion, China Wholesalers let people around the world about the wholesale from china , china wholesale purchase and let the world buy products wholesale to such a good product.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Really trustworthy blog. Please keep updating with great posts like this one. I have booked marked your site and am about to email it

    to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading..
    seslisohbet
    seslichat
    sesli sohbet
    sesli chat
    sesli

    ReplyDelete