Tuesday, May 02, 2006

The PNAC Paper Trail

The longer the fiasco in Iraq drags on, the more we hear the folks who cooked up the idea of invading that sand dune republic denying that they had anything to do with it. Crooks and Liars provided this John Bolton quote from a press conference televised last week on CNN.
We did not violate the UN charter in the war to overthrow Saddam Hussein and that plan was not drawn…at the Project for the New American Century.

John's memory must be slipping, what with all those responsibilities he has as Ambassador to the United Nations now. Maybe it's time to help him refresh it.

Let's take a stroll down PNAC Lane.

June 3, 1997: PNAC issues its Statement of Principles. "American foreign and defense policy is adrift," it states at the beginning, and goes on to criticize the Clinton administration. This document contains no specific mention of Iraq, but does admonish that, "America has a vital role in maintaining peace and security in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East," and that "we need to increase defense spending significantly if we are to carry out our global responsibilities today and modernize our armed forces for the future[.]"

Among the signatories are Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz, as well as PNAC co-founders Bill Kristol and Robert Kagan.

January 19, 1998: John Bolton publishes "Congress Versus Iraq" in Bill Kristol's Weekly Standard. He slams President Clinton for being soft on Iraq, and exhorts Congress to force Clinton into taking more aggressive action against Saddam Hussein.

January 26, 1998: PNAC sends a letter to President Clinton urging military action to remove the Saddam Hussein regime from power. A key passage states that if America continues its containment policy, "…the safety of American troops in the region, of our friends and allies like Israel and the moderate Arab states, and a significant portion of the world’s supply of oil will all be put at hazard."

Keep that in mind the next time young Mister Bush says invading Iraq wasn't about Israel or oil. (Please note that I have no problem with America keeping Israel under its protective umbrella. But we didn't need to invade Iraq to do it.)

And, oh, one of the signatures on that letter belongs to a guy named John Bolton.

A copy of the letter appears in the Washington Post on January 27.

January 30, 1998: PNAC founders Bill Kristol and Robert Kagan publish "Bombing is not Enough" in the New York Times. "Saddam Hussein must go," it says. "If Mr. Clinton is serious about protecting us and our allies from Iraqi biological and chemical weapons, he will order ground forces to the gulf. Four heavy divisions and two airborne divisions are available for deployment. The President should act, and Congress should support him in the only policy that can succeed."

There's no question: PNAC was specifically calling for an armed invasion of Iraq by ground forces. How many teams of lawyers do they need to talk their way around that?

February 2, 1998: Robert Kagan publishes "Saddam's Impending Victory" in Bill Kristol's Weekly Standard. Kagan again calls for removal of Hussein by force and compares him to Hitler.

February 26, 1998: Kristol and Kagan publish "A 'Great Victory' for Iraq" in the Washington Post. "Unless we are willing to live in a world where everyone has to 'do business' with Saddam and his weapons of mass destruction, we need to be willing to use U.S. air power and ground troops to get rid of him."

March 9, 1998: Bolton publishes "Kofi Hour" in the Weekly Standard and criticizes the Clinton administration for working through the UN to deal with Hussein.

September 18, 1998: PNAC's Paul Wolfowitz testifies before the House National Security Committee on Iraq during which he condemns the Clinton's Iraq policy. "The Clinton Administration repeatedly makes excuses for its own weakness…"

September 28, 1998: Robert Kagan's "A Way to Oust Saddam" appears in the Weekly Standard. "It has long been clear that the only way to rid the world of Saddam's weapons of mass destruction is to rid Iraq of Saddam."

November 16, 1998: An non-attributed editorial in the Weekly Standard titled "How to Attack Iraq" says, "It now seems fairly certain that some time in the next few weeks the Clinton administration will have to strike Iraq. There really are no acceptable alternatives."

January 4, 1999: Robert Kagan's "Saddam Wins-Again" appears in the Weekly Standard. More castigation of UN and Clinton administration efforts to contain Saddam Hussein.

Skip Ahead

There's much more. You can read the entire PNAC literature on Iraq at the group's website, starting here.

But let's take a close look at two key PNAC documents from the 21st century.

Rebuilding America's Defenses was published in September 2000, just before the presidential election that brought George W. Bush into power. This neoconservative manifesto revealed that the PNAC's ambitions in the Middle East were only obliquely related to Saddam Hussein.
The United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein. (Page 14.)

In other words, Hussein was merely the convenient excuse for establishing permanent military bases in the heart of the Middle East and controlling the flow of the region's oil.

But the PNACers realized that the road to achieving their dream of a global American empire was "…likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event--like a new Pearl Harbor." (Page 51.)

On September 11, 2001 PNAC got its Pearl Harbor, and a significant portion of its membership held key policy making posts in the Bush administration, some of the most notable among them being Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, and Bolton.

On September 20, nine days after the 9/11 attacks, PNAC wrote a letter to Mister Bush that said, "…even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq."


DNA evidence couldn't provide better proof that the PNAC formulated the Bush administration's Iraq policy than the paper trail the PNAC itself provides. For Bolton to deny that the PNAC "planned" the Iraq invasion goes beyond irony, beyond the absurd, beyond the Orwellian.

There's a temptation to shrug one's shoulders and say, "Why dwell on this? It's in the past."

But it's not in the past. We're living with the neoconservative nightmare today and there's no telling how long it will take to undo their damage, partly because they're still in power and they're still doing damage.


  1. Seven of Six1:13 PM

    Jeff, I'm glad you brought this up.
    There are many in America who still don't know or were aware of the PNAC agenda. It should be in front of every liberal blogsite so that people understand the treachery of this administration and why some of us do what we do. I know a lot of people will have a better understanding of why we oppose this Administration.
    It should be in the history books as to how a group of people were able to hijack a country!
    I want my once Great Country back!!

  2. Hmmm. I'm guessing this is probably semantics. The documentation doesn't show that PNAC actually "planned" the invasion in the sense that they determined exactly what strategy would be used and how the war would be conducted, even though they favored the course of action. Hasn't Kristol been critical of the way in which the war has been conducted, even though he supports the idea behind it?

    I suppose the more important question, in all seriousness, is why should we care whether people from PNAC were involved in the planning or not? A bad plan is a bad plan, no matter who came up with it. I don't really care whether these guys belong to PNAC or don't belong to it, the conduct of the war has been poor. I prefer to look at the actions of the government on an individual basis, and not with regard to some long-term agenda of a group like PNAC. The agends can't come about unless each of the individual steps are undertaken, and if any of the steps are bad ideas, then they should be opposed. If they are good ideas, they should be supported. The long-term agenda doesn't come about unless each of the individual steps come about, so I think it makes more sense to look at what the government is doing one by one.

    The important thing, to me, is that the war in Iraq is being badly mishandled. I don't care if the guys handling it belong to PNAC or the Mouseketeers, it doesn't change the fact they're screwing up.

  3. Can we get "Colbert" to question President Bush on the PNAC connection, he did such a great job with William Kristol the other night, think what he could do with the regular people, Kristol is a regular TV personna on the F channel Great article Jeff

  4. Seven of Six1:57 PM

    I suppose the more important question, in all seriousness, is why should we care whether people from PNAC were involved in the planning or not?

    I'm sorry, crap is crap! And when an idea starts effecting the lives of human beings then there should be a law against it! PNAC and its 'crap' have brought nothing but destruction, grief, graft and corruption under the guise of a bunch of good ole boys. How much longer are the people of America willing to stand by these good ole boys and watch it be destroyed?

  5. Seven of six:

    I wouldn't be so quick to pass laws about everything. Lots of ideas affect people, but we don't need to go outlawing them. That's what China is for.

    But you're making my point for me. Crap is crap - exactly right. The conduct of the war has been crap. Who cares whether it was due to PNAC or someone else? I suppose it could make a difference if someone with a PNAC connection were running for future office, but othewise I'm content just to make sure the crappy ideas aren't rewarded.

  6. William Bollinger5:15 PM

    Crap is crap, and groups that generate crap should have any future ideas given a bit more scrutiny, to keep crap out of the system. PNAC may not have been the only crap source, but any future "suggestions" from them should be concidered suspect.

  7. Seven of Six5:31 PM

    Oh...there is a law against that crap, they used to call it 'war profiteering'!

  8. William:

    That's true enough; I guess I just don't see the point in spending so much time on PNAC. If they bring up future ideas then they can be addressed at that time. People spend so much time on conspiracy and cabal that it seems like we end up missing out on the more immediate issues. While we're fiddling (figuratively) with whether PNAC said this, that, or the other in 1998, Rome is burning.

  9. Seven of six:

    What law do you think PNAC has violated? Specifically, I mean? By putting forth their ideas...

  10. Scott, I think you're 1oo% wrong when you say, "I guess I just don't see the point in spending so much time on PNAC. If they bring up future ideas then they can be addressed at that time."

    This is exactly the point, and the thrust, of Jeff's article, IMO. The Likudnik moles in the US Govt, and associated with several of the right wing think tanks published their "grand strategy" almost 10 years ago, and the Republican Party has been eagerly following the plan ever since.

    Before you even protest, I grant you not ALL Republicans ate Likudniks. Some are merely corrupted by Big Money. But make no mistake about it, the PNAC plan specifically advocates a Mid East dominated militarily by the US and Israel. While the Wolfowitz/ Feith/ Perle wing of PNAC are most certainly more loyal to preservation of Israel than to the long-term safety of the US, the other wing, represented by JEB! Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney and John Bolton are far more loyal to the acquisition of mineral and fossil fuel resources.

    The new revelations regarding AIPAC and associated organizations are landmarks to the decades long treachery of espionage carried on inside the US and the US Government.

    I get steam coming out of my ears everytime I hear the AIPAC sympathizers whining about poor Johnathan Pollard, because no one ever whines about the US sailors massacred by the Israelis when they attacked the USS Libery three times during the 1967 war.

  11. Meribeth7:23 AM

    We have had 6 years of lies, graft, corruption, blatant cronyism, and "interpretation" of laws that favor the very very few and powerful. That does not sound like America.

    We have had powerful lobby groups and "think tanks" which are funded by large corporations manipulating the government process as well as setting forth an agenda that serves the purpose of the monied and powerful.

    We are in a war that was fanagled, falsified and set in motion (note: I avoided the word planned) many years in advance. To what purpose? Humanitarian? Well, at least that is what they are calling it now since all the lies (aka bad intelligence) are coming forth. If we were so concerned about humanitarian efforts and concerned about dictators (aka evil doerers) then why aren't we in the Sudan? Why did we allow Rowanda to happen? Why are we ignoring Uganda? Why was "ethnic cleansing" a non issue?

    We made a story for Viet Nam and we have made a story for Iraq, and we are after the natural resources once again. To set up a situation that is false in an effort to take what is not ours (by overt theft of making a deal with a connection) and to accomplish these ends people must die (aka collateral damage..cost of war) sounds like a crime to me. We have laws against this in our country. But then I forgot...our Prez can do whatever he finds necessary....

    Yep, they planned for it in advance. The people who were involved in the idea (aka planning) were installed in posts of very high power and the coffers of big business were opened to help this along in exchange for more BlingBling.

    Crap, we never learn from our past mistakes and in this case we can't seem to learn from our very recent mistakes. It isn't in the past, it is now and will be into the future. To ignore is and "move on" is something we cannot do because we have a responsibility to know the facts, and refuse the art of denial that our present government has developed to an art form.

  12. Something else I consider when looking at the Federalist Papers--they were written by three guys. (Hamilton, Jay, and, I think, Madison). They did not represent the entire "framing" body, and several things in the Fed Papers are contrary to what the Constitution actually says.

    In other words, they're not the Constitution.

  13. Jeff and Lurch:

    So are you two strict textualists? Because if so we can have some very interesting discussions. For example, I am pro-choice and believe that should be a federally-protected right. The right is not, however, ever explicitly set forth in the Constitution, and so on its face the Constitution leaves the issue to the States.

    The Federalist Papers set forth in part the intentions of some of the important drafters of the Constitution, just like legislative history sets forth the intent of a legislature. A good way of determining how the Constitution ought to be interpreted is by looking at what people who drafted it said.

    Another good way to determine it is to look at what contemporary people did.

    Lurch: this gets us back to the Executive. One way to determine how much power the framers thought the executive had over foreign affairs was to look at how the Executive was handled at the start of the country.

    Washington, for example, himself negotiated Pickney's treaty and Jay's treaty, he was also the person who determined that America would remain neutral in the face of wars in Europe, and founders like Alexander Hamilton called on him personally to attempt to sway his position on war in Europe after the French Revolution (apparently Hamilton, one of the Framers, thought the power to make the decision belonged to Washington.

    But Washington wasn't really one of the Framers. What about Jefferson? His presidency was dominated by foreign affairs. He personally stopped tribute payments to Tripoli, and then when Tripoli declared war he personally dispatched naval vessels to Tripoli to handle things and told the Congress about it later. He also took it upon himself to suspend trade with both England and France at one point. Apparently Jefferson, a framer, thought he had a lot of power in foreign affairs as the head of the Executive, and Jefferson was actually a guy who was very concerned about the federal government not overstepping its authority.

    You can find a similar breadth of authority, I think, by looking at other early Presidents.

    At any rate - to determine what the Framers meant (if as a collective they can have an intent) it is best to look at contemporaneous documents and statements. That's my view, but I'm not a textualists. If you two are, we can discuss that as well. It leads to very limited federal powers indeed.

  14. Seven of Six6:54 AM

    What law do you think PNAC has violated? Specifically, I mean? By putting forth their ideas...

    Scott, Meribeth pretty much covered it.
    Aside from your basic moral laws it will be hard to bring a case against PNAC.
    Of course I'd love to see this whole administration put in the Hague. That would make up most of PNAC.

  15. Seven of six:

    Are you a socialist, by chance? I'm not asking to antagonize, I'm just curious. I have a good friend who is a socialist and holds the viewpoint that people should be punished for "ideas" in some cases (which is something that I believe should not be allowed), and he's also in favor of bringing U.S. officials in front of The Hague (which I also oppose because such a court would nto provide the U.S. Constitutional protections that I believe U.S. citizens are entitled to).

    Of course a lot more goes into socialism the above. The Hague issue isn't really one of socialism in and of itself, I only mention it because it tracks my buddy's beliefs. But the idea of punishing people for thoughts or ideas seems to me to be a pretty big part of the guy's philosophy, the idea being that since the social structure always trumps the individual, ideas that may be harmful to the social structure can be punished.

  16. Slightly related to the last few comments: it seems that the visible non-administration PNACers trying to distance themselves from the administration are thinking at least partly about the legal angle.

    As RSK suggests, having the idea and acting on it in a way that may be illegal are two different things.

    Perle, Buckley, Kagan, Kristol and Fukuyama are just a few of the big name PNACers we're now seeing deny direct responsibility for anything that may or may not have happened in the Bush White House.

  17. Seven of Six2:23 PM

    Scott, Sometimes I wonder if you just like to play devil's advocate.
    I lean socialist in matters of corporations raping this country (Oil for one), the health industry, Education and taxes.
    I will go for bu$h hiding behind our constitution when he and his neo-cons stop using it to wipe their backsides with it and respect it!
    The constitution is what I defended my country for! Not some individual.
    Right now we need to take some extreme measures to right the almost sunken ship that is the USA!
    Go ahead, ask me, "What constitutional laws do you think bu$h and his cronies have violated"?
    But before you do, please, use your imagination.

  18. Seven of six:

    I do indeed like to play devil's advocate, but I was genuinely curious about the socialist question, primarily because my friend and I had a long discussion on that very topic a few months ago. I didn't intend the question as a jab, as I have nothing against socialist people even though I'm not a socialist myself by any means. I don't believe in demonizing a person, as a rule, simply due to differing political or social views.

    As for the Constitution, I think one of the great things about it is that even those who disregard it are themselves given its benefits by the rest of us.

    I also agree that the Bush administration has violated the Constitution, with the two examples of this that come to mind most immediately being: 1) indefinite detention of individuals without due process; and 2) warrantless wiretapping by the NSA.

  19. Seven of Six5:26 PM

    Thank you, sorry for getting testy!

  20. Anonymous8:22 PM

    Foreign Aid

    Clean BReak

    Juan cole paper on Israel influence

    AIPAC v. Norman Finkelstein: A Debate on Israel's Assault on Gaza

    The Israel Lobby




    UN resolution Israel has violated

    PNAC lying

  21. Nice list of links. Thanks.

  22. Lacoste polo shirts to the people's feeling is natural and pro-and the Burbrery polos comfortable, affordable good wear burberry polo shirt both in Europe and the United States or Asia, almost Everyone must become a wardrobe in the style of clothing! There are so many beautiful coat, but also with the needs of others can be more perfect. Levi jeanshave a straight trouser leg, it looks clean and able; Diesel Jeans and Levis Jeansis pet fashion, elegance and fashion, with a polo shirt and holding babolat aeropro driveor cheap tennis racquets, what you can think of.

  23. Also popular as a way to fashion, China Wholesalers let people around the world about the wholesale from china , china wholesale purchase and let the world buy products wholesale to such a good product.

  24. Ed hardy shirts to tattoos tattoo art and graffiti into the street among the ed hardy clothes. Puma basketby the majority of consumers, Puma basket of products that were sold out on a listing. Cheap puma shoes and match various types of clothing, belts, cheap jacket, Wholesale Handbags, watches, pens and other products are also beautifully designed, excellent technology, elegant shape. People buy nike max shoes, they are also no longer pick Association other goods.

  25. 1

    polo shirts

    polo shirts supplies.wholesale polo shirts with great price. 12hot.com offers lot of 10 polo shirts and lot of 20 polo shirts. 12hot.com offers classic fit polo shirts.polo clothing All our shirts made in original factory.

    spyder jackets

    12hot.com offers spyder jackets :

    north face jackets

    north face jackets,north face jacket. Here is a black The North Face Women's mountain jacket .

    Women's Sky Blue The North Face Original Twinset Parka/Jacket

    This is a style of sky blue The Women's North Face outdoor and mountaineering apparel .The North Face offers advanced fabrics and technologies for all-weather performance and protection during demanding outdoor action. The design adds darts at the elbow, allowing for easier arm movement and a full range of motion. The internal wind skirt effectively keeps snow and wind out.
    100% Omni-Tech!


    polo shirts

    new polo shirts,polo shirts,polo shirt,Ralph Lauren polo shirts,polos .Paypal payment. we have best price.Welcome to wholesale Lacoste polo shirts


    cheap polo shirts

    Buy cheap polo shirts,polo shirt,lacoste polo shirts,ralph lauren polo shirts,wholesale polo shirts


    Lacoste Polo Shirts

    Retail and Wholesale Lacoste Polo Shirts Cheap Lacoste Polo Shirts Polo Shirts Cheap Polo Shirts at cheap price with PayPal free shipping


    ugg boots

    UGG short Boots
    UGG 5245 tall Boots
    UGG 5325 classic Boots
    UGG 5359 womens Boots
    UGG 5815 tall Boots
    UGG 5819 womens Boots
    UGG 5825 short Boots


    chi flat iron

    chi flat iron
    InStyler rotating hot iron with a heat resistant carrying bag
    New BLUE CAMO CHI Camo Colletion 1" flat iron
    New CHI Turbo 2 Big Flat Iron
    New GREEN CAMO CHI Camo Colletion 1" flat iron
    Black CHI Ceramic Flat Iron Original Farouk Hair Straightener

    CHI hair straightener

    Very Cheap! www.thehairstraighteners.com is a professional supplier to supply CHI hair straightener Welcome to wholesale hair straighteners at www.thehairstraighteners.com.
    CHI Straightener Blue Camo
    CHI Straightener Green Camo
    CHI Straightener Pink Camo
    Original CHI Hair Straightener
    CHI Turbo Big 2-Inch Hair Straightener


    spyder jackets
    new discount spyder women's insulated ski jacket in orange
    2009 new women's syder jackets insulated in white and red
    women's discount spyder ski jacket insulated in red
    women's cheap spyder ski suit insulated in pink
    brand new men's spyder ski jackets in gray

  26. Present-day society, the rapid development of science and technology makes cell phones wholesale is no longer a simple phone communications equipment only. Wholesale cell phones have many features, entertainment, scalability, and so have a good expression of the discount cell phones will be to maximize the effectiveness of multimedia technology.
    Cell phones from simple communication became a full-featured entertainment terminal . Can be said that cell phone china new milestone in the industry. This fully demonstrates that, cheap cell phones entertainment has become the most sought after consumer applications and has become the focus of the mobile phones market.

  27. Truely a nice blog and thanks for your great work. By the way,welcom to our websites: http://www.shoxsport.com and http://www.ed-hardy-clothing.us . We provide cheap nike shox shoes which are brand new and in perfect condition but on discount, including the popularNIKE SHOX TORCH, nike sports shoes , cheap sport shoes and so on. Nothing would be more suitable than the nike shox r4 and Nike air max tn for the people like runing. AuthenticNike Mens Shoes ,nike tn dollar and cheap puma shoes puma shoes , cheap nike shoxare available on our sites. the NIKE WOMEN SHOES is fitting to running. Wholesale and retail are both acceptable to us. Welcome to our site and free to look! Thank you and wish you a nice day. Good Luck! As we all know, Ed Hardyis the world famouse clothing brand famouse for the ed hardy clothing, ed hardy clothes,cheap ed hardy shoes,Ed Hardy Hoodies,ed hardy winter boots, ed hardy polo shirts. All of the product of ed hardy are popular around the world. In addition, the ed hardy accessories such as edhardy sunglasses,ed hardy hats,ed hardy winter boots are also available on our sites. For the youth who like to pursue fashion and show their personalities, the ed hardy womens hoodies ,ed hardy womens clothes, Ed Hardy Trousers, , ed hardy ugg boots, ed hardy swim suit, ed hardy womens t shirts,ed hardy christian audigier are necessary. Do NOT miss it! Wholesale and retail are both acceptable to us. Welcome to our site and free to look! Thank you and wish you a nice day.

  28. Truely a nice blog and thanks for your great work. By the way, welcome to our websites: cheap adidas shoes and ghd hair straightners. Every men like sport, then, it is quite important to have a pair of right sports shoes to make you fully enjoy the sports. We provide nike sport shoes , cheap sport shoes, puma cat shoes, cheap nike shox shoes, cheap nike max shoes, shox shoes, nike shox r4running shoes which are brand new and in perfect condition but on discount.
    All of the shoes, including the popularferrari shoespuma running shoes, nike tn dollar,which is the representative shoes of nike air max tnshoes are authentic and original of top quality. For people like running and playing basketball and other field sports, nothing would be more suitable than the puma shoes and nike shox nz basketball shoes. In addition to the shoes mentioned above, you may also be interested in the cheap adidas shoes , JORDAN WOMEN SHOES and nike running shoes, puma shoes , Nike Air Max Tn shoes and so on. The Nike air max series are specially designed and made for runners. It is the professional NIKE WOMEN SHOES for running . Wholesale and retail are both acceptable to us. Welcome to our site and free to look! Thank you and wish you a nice day. Good Luck!Everybody like beauty, which is quite commen, especailly womens. Welcom to our store which is focused on sellingghd hair straighteners mk4and hair straightners. For women, especially the young girls, this pink ghd hair straightenersis the best choice. ghd hair straightnersis famouse for the pretty outlook and the top quality. The price of this cheap ghd hair straightenersis acceptable and rational.
    The ghd iv styler hair straightener is the newest product with a nice outlook and top quality.ghd mk4 hair straightener, purple ghd hair straighteners is beautiful, favourite by girls. ghd hair straightnersis necessary for you. It will be not difficult to you to become beautiful.

  29. Your blog is wonderful, I like it very much, thank you!
    By the way, do you like polo shirts, which are very chic, especially the polo t shirts, I love them very much. I also like playing tennis rackets, it can keep healthy, what do you like to do?
    We are the outlet of polo t shirts women, polo t shirts on sale, polo t shirts for women, polo shirts on sale, these products are best-seller in our store online.besides we also sell polo shirts men, men's polo shirt, men polo shirt, mens polo shirts, mens polo shirt and cheap polo shirts, discount polo shirts, men's polo shirts, women's polo shirts We are also the outlet of cheap tennis racket, discount tennis racket and the main product is prince tennis racquet, head tennis rackets, wilson tennis racket, babolat tennis racquet. So if you love sports, you should not miss our store, we can meet what you want, and you can find many surprise in our store

  30. I had never see a blog batter than this blog, I like this blog very very much.By the way, do you like my products: sanitary valve, street lights, street lighting, street lamps, ball valves, butterfly valves, butterfly valve handles, check valves, sanitary fittings, butterfly valve handles, butterfly valve handles, solar street lights, street light, valve manufacturer, butterfly valve handles, street lamp, solar street light, ball valve, butterfly valve handles, butterfly valve, check valve, butterfly valve handles

  31. Fashion trends change on daily basis, like Cheap GHD Straighteners (you can get it from a GHD Outlet), Why not get rid of your old straighteners to buy new GHDs? There is another kind hair straightener, called CHI hair Straighteners. Do you want to buy Discount GHD Styler? Following the latest in designer shades has become a passion of everyone, now 2010 Cheap Sunglasses, or we can say 2010 Discount Sunglasses. If you are the type of a woman who loves to explore in fashion, our Sunglasses Outlet will definitely satisfy your taste, because as you can see, we wholesale Sunglasses. Designer shades with optical grade lenses are important to protect our eyes from the sun. Don’t forget us-- Sunglasses Wholesale. Ed hardy streak of clothing is expanded into its wholesale ED Hardy chain so that a large number of fans and users can enjoy the cheap ED Hardy Clothes range easily with the help of numerous secured websites, actually, our discount ED Hardy Outlet. As we all know, in fact Wholesale Ed Hardy,is based on the creations of the world renowned tattoo artist Don Ed Hardy. Why Ed hardy wholesale? Well, this question is bound to strike the minds of all individuals. Many people may say cheap Prada is a joke, but we can give you discount Prada, because we have Prada Outlet. Almost everyone will agree that newest Prada handbags are some of the most beautiful designer handbags (Prada handbags 2010) marketed today. The reason is simple: fashion prohibited by AnkhRoyalty, in other words, we can write it as Ankh Royalty the Cultural Revolution. Straightens out the collar, the epaulette epaulet, the Ankh Royalty Clothing two-row buckle. Would you like to wear Ankh Royalty Clothes?Now welcome to our AnkhRoyalty Outlet.